New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers

John Taylor, Volker Wieland, Tobias Cwik and John F. Cogan

No 7236, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Renewed interest in fiscal policy has increased the use of quantitative models to evaluate policy. Because of modeling uncertainty, it is essential that policy evaluations be robust to alternative assumptions. We find that models currently being used in practice to evaluate fiscal policy stimulus proposals are not robust. Government spending multipliers in an alternative empirically-estimated and widely-cited new Keynesian model are much smaller than in these old Keynesian models; the estimated stimulus is extremely small just when needed most, and GDP and employment effects are only one-sixth as large, with private sector employment impacts likely to be even smaller.

Keywords: Fiscal policy; Government spending; Keynesian models; Model uncertainty; Multiplier (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C52 E62 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cba, nep-fdg and nep-mac
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (141)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP7236 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers (2010)
Working Paper: New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers (2009)
Working Paper: New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers (2009)
Working Paper: New Keynesian Versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers (2009)
Working Paper: New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:7236

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP7236

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().