Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments – Evidence from a natural field experiment

Mark Kassis, Sascha Schmidt (), Dominik Schreyer and Matthias Sutter

CREMA Working Paper Series from Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)

Abstract: In this paper, we show that the right to determine the sequence of moves in a dynamic team tournament improves the chances of winning the contest. Because studying dynamic team tournaments – like R&D races – with interim feedback is difficult with company data, we examine decisions of highly paid professionals in soccer penalty shootouts and show that teams whose captains can decide about the shooting sequence are more likely to win the shootout. So, managerial decisions matter for outcomes of dynamic tournaments and we discuss potential reasons for this finding.

Keywords: Dynamic tournament; sports professionals; psychological pressure; value of decision rights; penalty shoot-outs; behavioral economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D00 D81 D91 Z20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-spo
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.crema-research.ch/papers/2020-17.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
https://www.crema-research.ch/abstracts/2020-17.htm Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments – evidence from a natural field experiment (2021)
Working Paper: Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments – Evidence from a natural field experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Psychological Pressure and the Right to Determine the Moves in Dynamic Tournaments: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments – Evidence from a natural field experiment (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cra:wpaper:2020-17

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CREMA Working Paper Series from Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anna-Lea Werlen ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).