Relative performance feedback to teams

William Gilje Gjedrem and Ola Kvaløy

Labour Economics, 2020, vol. 66, issue C

Abstract: Work teams often receive feedback on how well their team is performing relative to their benchmarks. In this paper, we investigate experimentally how teams respond to relative performance feedback (RPF). We find that when subjects work under team incentives, then RPF on team performance increases the teams’ average performance by almost 10%. The treatment effect is driven by higher top performance, as this is almost 20% higher when the teams receive RPF compared to when the teams only receive absolute performance feedback (APF). The experiment suggests that top performers are particularly motivated by the combination of team incentives and team RPF. We also find notable gender differences. Females respond negatively to individual RPF, but even more positively than males to team RPF.

Keywords: Teams; Performance feedback; Performance pay; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537120300695
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Relative Performance Feedback to Teams (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:labeco:v:66:y:2020:i:c:s0927537120300695

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101865

Access Statistics for this article

Labour Economics is currently edited by A. Ichino

More articles in Labour Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().