Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice and Patient Harm: Evidence from Medical Malpractice Cases and Adverse Action Reports
Sara Markowitz and
Andrew J.D. Smith
No 31109, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Many states have recently changed their scope of practice laws and granted full practice authority to nurse practitioners, allowing them to practice without oversight from physicians. Physician groups have argued against this change, citing patient safety concerns. In this paper, we use a ratio-in-ratio approach to evaluate whether the transition to full practice authority results in harm to patients as proxied by rates of malpractice payouts and adverse action reports against nurse practitioners. We find no evidence of such harm, and instead find that physicians may benefit from the law change in terms of reduced malpractice payouts against them.
JEL-codes: I1 K1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
Note: EH LE
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published as Sara Markowitz & Andrew J. D. Smith, 2024. "Nurse practitioner scope of practice and patient harm: Evidence from medical malpractice payouts and adverse action reports," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol 43(2), pages 420-445.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31109.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31109
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31109
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().