Accessibility and the choice of network investments in the London Underground
David Levinson,
David Giacomin and
Antony Badsey Ellis
Additional contact information
Antony Badsey Ellis: Nexus (Networks, Economics, and Urban Systems) Research Group, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota
No 124, Working Papers from University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group
Abstract:
In 1863, the Metropolitan Railway of what came to be known as the London Underground successfully opened as the world’s first subway. Its high ridership spawned interest in additional links. Entrepreneurs secured funding and then proposed new lines to Parliament for approval, though only a portion were actually approved. While putative rail barons may have conducted some economic analysis, the final decision lay with Parliament, which did not have available modern transportation economic or geographic analysis tools. How good were the decisions that Parliament made in approving Underground Lines? This paper explores the role accessibility played on the decision to approve or reject proposed early London Tube Schemes. It finds that maximizing accessibility to population (highly correlated with revenue and ridership) largely explains Parliamentary approvals and rejections.
Keywords: Accessibility; Network Growth; Subways; Public Transport; Travel Behavior; Networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-his, nep-tre and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Journal of Transport and Land Use 9(1) 131-150.
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/11299/180065 Second version, 2015 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nex:wpaper:londonaccessibility
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by David Levinson ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).