The challenge of representative design in psychology and economics

Robin Hogarth ()

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2005, vol. 12, issue 2, 253-263

Abstract: The demands of 'representative design' set a high methodological standard. Both experimental participants and the situations with which they are faced should be representative of the populations to which researchers claim to generalize results. Failure to observe the latter has led to notable experimental failures in psychology from which economics could learn. It also raises questions about the meaning of testing economic theories in 'abstract' environments. Logically, abstract tests can only be generalized to 'abstract realities' and these may or may not have anything to do with the 'empirical realities' experienced by economic actors.

Keywords: experiments; representative design; sampling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501780500086172 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The challenge of representative design in psychology and economics (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:12:y:2005:i:2:p:253-263

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20

DOI: 10.1080/13501780500086172

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().