Moral Hazard and the US Stock Market: The Idea of a 'Greenspan Put'

Marcus Miller and Paul Weller
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Lei Zhang () and Lei Zhang ()

No 3041, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The risk premium in the US stock market has fallen far below its historic level, which Shiller (2000) attributes to a bubble driven by psychological factors. As an alternative explanation, we point out that the observed risk premium may be reduced by one-sided intervention policy on the part of the Federal Reserve which leads investors into the erroneous belief that they are insured against downside risk. By allowing for partial credibility and state dependent risk aversion, we show that this ?insurance? ? referred to as the Greenspan put ? is consistent with the observation that implied volatility rises as the market falls. Our bubble, like Shiller?s, involves market psychology: but what we describe is not so much ?irrational exuberance? as exaggerated faith in the stabilising power of Mr. Greenspan.

Keywords: Asset bubble; Monetary policy; Greenspan put; risk premium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D84 E52 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001-11
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP3041 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3041

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP3041

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().