How (not) to measure competition

Jan C. van Ours, Jan Boone and Henry Wiel

No 6275, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: We introduce a new measure of competition: the elasticity of a firm's profits with respect to its cost level. A higher value of this profit elasticity (PE) signals more intense competition. Using firm-level data we compare PE with the most popular competition measures such as the price cost margin (PCM). We show that PE and PCM are highly correlated on average. However, PCM tends to misrepresent the development of competition over time in markets with few firms and high concentration, i.e. in markets with high policy relevance. So, just when it is needed the most PCM fails whereas PE does not. From this we conclude that PE is a more reliable measure of competition.

Keywords: Competition; Concentration; Measures of competition; Price cost margin; Profit elasticity; Profits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D43 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-com, nep-cse, nep-ind and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (92)

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP6275 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: How (Not) to Measure Competition (2007)
Working Paper: How (Not) to Measure Competition (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:6275

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP6275

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().