Immigrant-Native Wage Gaps over Two Generations: Does the Field of Study Matter?

Kevin Pineda-Hernández, François Rycx, Thomas Senterre and Mélanie Volral
Additional contact information
Kevin Pineda-Hernández: ULB (CEBRIG, DULBEA), UMONS (Soci&ter)
François Rycx: ULB (CEBRIG, DULBEA), UMONS (Soci&ter), UCLouvain (IRES), GLO and IZA@LISER
Thomas Senterre: ULB (CEBRIG, DULBEA), UMONS (Soci&ter)
Mélanie Volral: UMONS (Soci&ter), ULB (CEBRIG, DULBEA)

No 2026011, LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)

Abstract: Although a growing number of studies highlight the moderating role of educational attainment on the wage differential between immigrants and natives, the influence of the field of study remains largely unexplored. We aim to fill this gap by drawing on detailed, matched employer-employee data on workers holding a master’s degree in Belgium for the period 1999-2016. After controlling for a wide range of covariates, our regression analyses show that the wage gap between immigrant and native workers with degrees in higher-paying fields (i.e. STEM and LEM) narrows considerably over two generations, but remains significant. By contrast, among workers with degrees in lower-paying fields (i.e. Other Social Sciences, Education, Services, Arts and Humanities) the wage gap between immigrants and natives disappears within two generations. Furthermore, our wage decompositions reveal that immigrant graduates are somewhat more likely to hold degrees in higher-paying fields than natives, which results in a small positive quantity effect. However, they also show that wage returns associated with fields of study are significantly lower for immigrants than for natives. This leads to a negative price effect, which, in percentage points, is halved over two generations. Altogether, the combined price and quantity effects – with the former far outweighing the latter – account for between 28 and 37% of the overall pay gap between natives and first- and second-generation immigrants, respectively. Sensitivity tests using a more detailed classification of fields of study further refine our results.

Keywords: Immigrant-native wage gap; first- and second-generation immigrants; field of study; matched employer-employee data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I23 I24 I25 I26 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2026011.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctl:louvir:2026011

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Place Montesquieu 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Virginie LEBLANC ().