Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation. Experimental evidence

Julia Brüggemann, Paolo Crosetto, Lukas Meub and Kilian Bizer

Research Policy, 2016, vol. 45, issue 10, 2054-2068

Abstract: In this paper we contribute to the discussion on whether intellectual property rights foster or hinder innovation by means of a laboratory experiment. We introduce a novel Scrabble-like word-creation task that captures most essentialities of a sequential innovation process. We use this task to investigate the effects of intellectual property allowing subjects to impose license fees on their innovations. We find intellectual property to have an adverse effect on welfare as innovations become less frequent and less sophisticated. Introducing communication among innovators does not reduce this detrimental effect. Introducing intellectual property results in more basic innovations, with subjects failing to exploit the most valuable sequential innovation paths. Subjects act more self-reliant and non-optimally in order to avoid paying license fees. Our results suggest that granting intellectual property rights hinders innovation, especially for sectors characterized by a strong sequentiality in innovation processes.

Keywords: Innovation; Intellectual property; Laboratory experiment; Real effort task; Creativity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D89 P14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733316301159
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation. Experimental evidence (2016)
Working Paper: Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation: experimental evidence (2015)
Working Paper: Intellectual property rights hinder sequential innovation: Experimental evidence (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:10:p:2054-2068

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.008

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().