An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union

Tristan Earle Grupp, Prakash Mishra, Mathias Reynaert and Arthur van Benthem
Additional contact information
Tristan Earle Grupp: Unknown
Prakash Mishra: Unknown
Arthur van Benthem: Unknown

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The European Union designates 26% of its landmass as protected areas, limiting economic development for biodiversity. We use the staggered introduction of protected areas between 1985 and 2019 to study the selection of protected land and the causal effect of protection on vegetation cover and nightlights. We find no meaningful impacts on either outcome across four decades, countries, protection cohorts, or land characteristics. These null effects are consistent with the political economy of EU land protection: weak incentives to internalize biodiversity gains, green-glow motives, and area-based targets shape local siting and stringency choices. In practice, strict protection is applied where development pressure is low–so that protection has little bite—while in high-pressure regions, protection is typically weak, imposing only limited constraints on economic activity.

Keywords: Land protection; protected areas; conservation; biodiversity; deforestation; vegetation cover; nightlights; staggered difference-in-differences; Europe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-02-04
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05492949v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05492949v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2026)
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2024)
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2023)
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2023)
Working Paper: An Evaluation of Protected Area Policies in the European Union (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05492949

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().