Mobile Push vs. Pull Targeting and Geo-Conquesting

Dominik Molitor (), Martin Spann (), Anindya Ghose () and Philipp Reichhart ()
Additional contact information
Dominik Molitor: Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York, New York 10023
Martin Spann: LMU Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 80539 Munich, Germany
Anindya Ghose: Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012
Philipp Reichhart: LMU Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 80539 Munich, Germany

Information Systems Research, 2025, vol. 36, issue 1, 184-201

Abstract: This study examines the impact of different mobile content delivery mechanisms on consumers’ coupon redemption behavior. Firms have two distinct content delivery options when engaging with consumers’ mobile devices: mobile push and mobile pull . Mobile push delivers firm-initiated (ad) content directly to consumers, whereas mobile pull requires consumers to initiate requests for (ad) content. We hypothesize that mobile push delivery increases the likelihood of coupon redemption due to reduced app-specific search costs compared with mobile pull. We further examine how app-specific use experience and store density influence the heterogeneity of consumer responses. To test our hypotheses, we conducted a large-scale randomized field experiment in a geo-conquesting setting, targeting customers located around competitor retail stores with mobile coupons to drive them to stores of the focal retailer. Our results reveal that mobile push increases coupon redemption rates by 6.0%, with substantial heterogeneity based on app-specific use experience and store density. Notably, app-specific usage experience negatively moderates the effect of mobile push delivery on redemptions, likely because both usage experience and push notifications reduce app-specific search costs, thereby acting as substitutes for one another. In areas with higher store density, the positive effect of mobile push delivery on the redemption likelihood is greater, suggesting that push notifications can highlight the focal coupon among alternative store choices, thereby lowering consumer switching costs. These findings have important implications for retailers and brands in creating competitive mobile targeting campaigns that effectively leverage both mobile push and pull delivery mechanisms.

Keywords: location-based advertising; mobile push; mobile pull; geo-conquesting; randomized field experiment; search costs; switching costs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0206 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orisre:v:36:y:2025:i:1:p:184-201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Information Systems Research from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().