Unbiased and Accurate: Measuring Sensitive Outcomes Through Ballot-Bag Surveys
Bruno Crépon (),
Ahmed Elsayed () and
Jules Gazeaud
Additional contact information
Bruno Crépon: CREST
Ahmed Elsayed: American University in Cairo
No 18072, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)
Abstract:
Prevailing methods for measuring sensitive outcomes confront researchers with an inherent bias-variance trade- off: direct questioning is prone to a sensitivity bias, while indirect methods such as list experiments are substantially less precise. We introduce the ballot-bag, a novel technique that relaxes this trade-off by mitigating bias in direct questioning while improving precision over indirect methods. In a field experiment in Egypt, where direct questions on irregular migration are biased, ballot-bag estimates closely align with those from a list experiment but exhibit significantly lower variance. Consequently, treatment effects are highly significant via the ballot-bag and not via the list experiment.
Keywords: field experiments; sensitivity bias; survey methods; sensitive behaviors; irregular migration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C83 C93 D83 J61 O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp18072.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18072
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().