Climbing the Job Ladder: New Evidence of Gender Inequity

David Johnston and Wang-Sheng Lee

No 5970, IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER

Abstract: An explanation for the gender wage gap is that women are less able or less willing to 'climb the job ladder.' However, the empirical evidence on gender differences in job mobility has been mixed. Focusing on a subsample of younger, university-educated workers from an Australian longitudinal survey, we find strong evidence that the dynamics of promotions and employer changes worsen women's labour market position.

Keywords: wage gap; job changes; promotions; gender (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J16 J33 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 pages
Date: 2011-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem, nep-hme, nep-lab and nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published - published in: Industrial Relations, 2012, 51 (1), 128 - 151

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp5970.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Climbing the Job Ladder: New Evidence of Gender Inequity (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5970

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from IZA Network @ LISER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Fallak ().