EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Impact of Corporate QE on Liquidity: Evidence from the UK

Lena Boneva, David Elliott, Iryna Kaminska, Oliver Linton, Nick McLaren and Ben Morley

The Economic Journal, 2022, vol. 132, issue 648, 2615-2643

Abstract: There is substantial uncertainty about the impact of quantitative easing on market liquidity. Identifying the impact is particularly challenging due to the potential for reverse causality, because liquidity considerations might affect quantitative easing purchases. We address this challenge by studying the Bank of England’s 2016–7 Corporate Bond Purchase Scheme. In particular, we use granular offer-level data from the Corporate Bond Purchase Scheme auctions to construct proxy measures for the Bank of England's demand for bonds and auction participants’ supply of bonds, allowing us to control for any reverse causality from liquidity to purchases. We find that Corporate Bond Purchase Scheme purchases improved the liquidity of purchased bonds.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueac033 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The impact of corporate QE on liquidity: evidence from the UK (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: The Impact of Corporate QE on Liquidity: Evidence from the UK (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:econjl:v:132:y:2022:i:648:p:2615-2643.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Journal is currently edited by Francesco Lippi

More articles in The Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press () and ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:132:y:2022:i:648:p:2615-2643.