Reservation Wages and Workers’ Valuation of Job Flexibility: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Kuan-Ming Chen, Ning Ding, John List and Magne Mogstad

Journal of the European Economic Association, 2025, vol. 23, issue 6, 2165-2211

Abstract: We quantify how labor supply elasticities and reservation wages vary between people and over time, and infer workers’ valuation of flexibility in their choices of work hours. Economists and policymakers are keenly interested in these quantities, especially lately with the growth in jobs that offer flexible work schedules. Our study takes advantage of a large natural field experiment at Uber, the largest ride-sharing company. Combining this experiment with high-frequency panel data on wages and individual work decisions, we estimate a dynamic labor supply model that let us recover reservation wages, labor supply elasticities, and workers’ valuation of flexibility. We also show the biases in reservation wages and labor supply elasticities that arise if one uses observational data on wages or a static labor supply model.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeea/jvaf022 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Reservation Wages and Workers' Valuation of Job Flexibility: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment (2020)
Working Paper: Reservation Wages and Workers’ Valuation of Job Flexibility: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jeurec:v:23:y:2025:i:6:p:2165-2211.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Romain Wacziarg

More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from European Economic Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().