EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Risk Pooling, Precautionary Saving and Consumption Growth

James Banks, Richard Blundell () and Agar Brugiavini

The Review of Economic Studies, 2001, vol. 68, issue 4, 757-779

Abstract: In this paper we model the evolution of income risk and consumption growth. We decompose the time series innovation of the income process into its common and cohort-specific components. From these we compute conditional variances which are used as separate risk terms in a consumption growth equation. Using a long series of British household data we exploit the time-series variation to identify precautionary saving effects and find strong evidence of their importance. Specifically, after allowing for demographic and labour market status, there is an independent role for income risk in explaining consumption growth. Rather than the component that is common across cohorts, however, it is the cohort-specific element that is important in determining changes in consumption growth. This result points to a failure of between-cohort insurance mechanisms.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (109)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-937X.00189 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Risk pooling, precautionary saving and consumption growth (1999) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:68:y:2001:i:4:p:757-779.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:68:y:2001:i:4:p:757-779.