Understanding the Size of the Government Spending Multiplier: It’s in the Sign

Régis Barnichon, Davide Debortoli and Christian Matthes

The Review of Economic Studies, 2022, vol. 89, issue 1, 87-117

Abstract: This article argues that an important, yet overlooked, determinant of the government spending multiplier is the direction of the fiscal intervention. Regardless of whether we identify government spending shocks from (1) a narrative approach or (2) a timing restriction, we find that the contractionary multiplier—the multiplier associated with a negative shock to government spending—is above 1 and largest in times of economic slack. In contrast, the expansionary multiplier—the multiplier associated with a positive shock—is substantially below 1 regardless of the state of the cycle. These results help understand seemingly conflicting results in the literature. A simple theoretical model with incomplete financial markets and downward nominal wage rigidities can rationalize our findings.

Keywords: Government spending; Asymmetry; Multipliers; E62; C32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdab029 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Understanding the Size of the Government Spending Multiplier: It's in the Sign (2020)
Working Paper: Understanding the Size of the Government Spending Multiplier: It's in the Sign (2020)
Working Paper: Understanding the size of the government spending multiplier: It’s in the sign (2020)
Working Paper: Understanding the Size of the Government Spending Multiplier: It's in the Sign (2017)
Working Paper: Understanding the Size of the Government Spending Multiplier: It's in the Sign (2016)
Working Paper: Understanding the size of the government spending multiplier: It's in the sign (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:89:y:2022:i:1:p:87-117.

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().