Motivated Political Reasoning: On the Emergence of Belief-Value Constellations

Kai Barron, Anna Becker and Steffen Huck
Additional contact information
Anna Becker: Stockholm University

No 510, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition

Abstract: We study the relationship between moral values (“ought” statements) and factual beliefs (“is” statements). We show that thinking about values affects the beliefs people hold. This effect is mediated by prior political leanings, thereby contributing to the polarization of factual beliefs. We document these findings in a pre-registered online experiment with a nationally representative sample of over 1,800 individuals in the US. We also show that participants do not distort their beliefs in response to financial incentives to do so, suggesting that deep values exert a stronger motivational force than financial incentives.

Keywords: motivated beliefs; values; polarization; experiment; reasoning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C90 D72 D74 D83 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-09-16
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-hpe and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/ ... ussion_paper/510.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations (2025)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rco:dpaper:510

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series from CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Viviana Lalli ().