Will I Pay for Your Pleasure? Consumers’ Perceptions of Negative Externalities and Responses to Pigovian Taxes

M. Paula Fitzgerald, Cait Poynor Lamberton and Frank Walsh

Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2016, vol. 1, issue 3, 355 - 377

Abstract: Pigovian taxes are time-honored responses to negative externalities in the commercial world: firms that pollute must pay the costs of the damage they do to their community. Such localization of costs to those who create them seems rational and fair. But when Pigovian taxes are presented to consumers, how do they respond? We show that to the extent consumers perceive that others’ behavior creates economic costs for them, they better understand and evaluate related communications and are more accepting of Pigovian interventions. Perceived negative externalities explain responses to Pigovian taxes better than other demographic and psychographic constructs often assumed to drive attitudes in this area. Finally, we show that responses to Pigovian interventions are driven by perceived fairness. This article offers an important starting place for marketers hoping to effectively communicate about Pigovian taxes, and for sponsoring policy makers who struggle to gain support among wide segments of the population.

Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686305 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686305 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/686305

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the Association for Consumer Research from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().