Explanations of the inconsistencies in survey respondents' forecasts

Michael Clements

European Economic Review, 2010, vol. 54, issue 4, 536-549

Abstract: A comparison of the point forecasts and the probability distributions of inflation and output growth made by individual respondents to the US Survey of Professional Forecasters indicates that the two sets of forecasts are sometimes inconsistent. We evaluate a number of possible explanations, and find that not all forecasters update their histogram forecasts as new information arrives. This is supported by the finding that the point forecasts are more accurate than the histograms in terms of first-moment prediction.

Keywords: Rationality; Point; forecasts; Probability; distributions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (50)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014-2921(09)00112-3
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Explanations of the inconsistencies in survey respondents' forecasts (2008)
Working Paper: Explanations of the inconsistencies in survey respondents'forecasts (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:54:y:2010:i:4:p:536-549

Access Statistics for this article

European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer

More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().