EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Who's naughty? Who's nice? Experiments on whether pro-social workers are selected out of cutthroat business environments

Mitchell Hoffman and John Morgan

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, vol. 109, issue C, 173-187

Abstract: Levitt and List (2007) hypothesize that pro-social individuals will be selected out of cutthroat industries. To study this, we measure the pro-social preferences of individuals in two such industries, domain trading and online adult entertainment (pornography). Contrary to the selection hypothesis, we find that these individuals exhibit a high degree of pro-sociality. They exhibit more altruism, trust, trustworthiness, and honesty than the typical student subject. They also respond differently to shame-based incentives. We offer a theory of reverse selection that can rationalize these findings.

Keywords: Selection hypothesis; Social preferences; Lying aversion; Shame aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 D22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268114002534
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:173-187

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.

More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

 
Page updated 2019-12-20
Handle: RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:109:y:2015:i:c:p:173-187