Justice perceptions of occupational training subsidies: findings from a factorial survey

Richard Wolff, Olaf Struck, Christopher Osiander, Monika Senghaas and Gesine Stephan
Additional contact information
Richard Wolff: Univ. Bamberg
Olaf Struck: Univ. Bamberg
Christopher Osiander: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Monika Senghaas: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany

Journal for Labour Market Research, 2022, vol. 56, Article 6

Abstract: "Workers whose jobs are affected by structural change and digitization are required to continuously adapt their vocational skills to the requirements of the labor market. This adaptation is also essential for the competitiveness of their employer firms. The German legislature addressed this issue with investive measures for unemployment insurance, one of which is the Qualification Opportunities Act (Qualifizierungschancengesetz). Funds taken from unemployment insurance can now be used to provide financial help for employers in a more direct way and on a broader scale than before. It became possible that not only unemployed individuals but also workers in companies receive state assistance. This paper analyses the extent to which citizens accept such public support programs for further training and which principles of justice they apply when assessing a just amount of training subsidies. We conducted two factorial surveys. First, we investigated the justice assessments of training subsidies for different types of firms. The results showed that citizens are inclined to subsidize companies by receiving social security funds for further training of their employees. However, when doing so, the principle of needs-based justice should be complied with. Second, we analyze whether citizens think it is just or unjust to provide training subsidies to different workers, as we present them with changing characteristics of workers. The findings confirmed that in addition to the principle of need, views on performance justice, as well as economic considerations are relevant in assessments of whether training subsidies co-financed by unemployment insurance are just." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer) ((en))

Keywords: Bundesrepublik Deutschland; IAB-Open-Access-Publikation; Auswirkungen; betriebliche Weiterbildung; Betriebsgröße; Bildungsertrag; Determinanten; Gerechtigkeit; abhängig Beschäftigte; öffentliche Meinung; Qualifizierungsmaßnahme; Subvention; technischer Wandel; Arbeitslosenversicherung; Wahrnehmung; Weiterbildungsbedarf; Weiterbildungsförderung; 2019-2020 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C99 D63 I38 J08 J24 J65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-06-14
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-022-00311-w

Related works:
Journal Article: Justice perceptions of occupational training subsidies: findings from a factorial survey (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabjlr:v:56:p:art.06

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.springer.com/economics/journal/12651

DOI: 10.1186/s12651-022-00311-w

Access Statistics for this article

Journal for Labour Market Research is currently edited by Joachim Möller et al.

More articles in Journal for Labour Market Research from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek ().