Justice perceptions of occupational training subsidies: findings from a factorial survey

Richard V. Wolff (), Olaf Struck (), Christopher Osiander (), Monika Senghaas () and Gesine Stephan
Additional contact information
Richard V. Wolff: University of Bamberg: Otto-Friedrich-Universitat Bamberg
Olaf Struck: University of Bamberg: Otto-Friedrich-Universitat Bamberg
Christopher Osiander: Institute for Employment Research (IAB): The Research Institute of the Federal Employment Agency
Monika Senghaas: Institute for Employment Research (IAB): The Research Institute of the Federal Employment Agency

Journal for Labour Market Research, 2022, vol. 56, issue 1, 1-18

Abstract: Abstract Workers whose jobs are affected by structural change and digitization are required to continuously adapt their vocational skills to the requirements of the labor market. This adaptation is also essential for the competitiveness of their employer firms. The German legislature addressed this issue with investive measures for unemployment insurance, one of which is the Qualification Opportunities Act (Qualifizierungschancengesetz). Funds taken from unemployment insurance can now be used to provide financial help for employers in a more direct way and on a broader scale than before. It became possible that not only unemployed individuals but also workers in companies receive state assistance. This paper analyses the extent to which citizens accept such public support programs for further training and which principles of justice they apply when assessing a just amount of training subsidies. We conducted two factorial surveys. First, we investigated the justice assessments of training subsidies for different types of firms. The results showed that citizens are inclined to subsidize companies by receiving social security funds for further training of their employees. However, when doing so, the principle of needs-based justice should be complied with. Second, we analyze whether citizens think it is just or unjust to provide training subsidies to different workers, as we present them with changing characteristics of workers. The findings confirmed that in addition to the principle of need, views on performance justice, as well as economic considerations are relevant in assessments of whether training subsidies co-financed by unemployment insurance are just.

Keywords: Occupational training; Unemployment insurance; Justice assessments; Factorial survey; Multilevel and mixed effects model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C99 D63 I38 J08 J24 J65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12651-022-00311-w Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Justice perceptions of occupational training subsidies: findings from a factorial survey (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jlabrs:v:56:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s12651-022-00311-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/12651

DOI: 10.1186/s12651-022-00311-w

Access Statistics for this article

Journal for Labour Market Research is currently edited by Joachim Möller

More articles in Journal for Labour Market Research from Springer, Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().