EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Hessel Oosterbeek, Randolph Sloof and Gijs Kuilen

Experimental Economics, 2004, vol. 7, issue 2, 188 pages

Abstract: This paper reports the findings of a meta-analysis of 37 papers with 75 results from ultimatum game experiments. We find that on average the proposer offers 40% of the pie to the responder. This share is smaller for larger pie sizes and larger when a strategy method is used or when subjects are inexperienced. On average 16% of the offers is rejected. The rejection rate is lower for larger pie sizes and for larger shares offered. Responders are less willing to accept an offer when the strategy method is employed. As the results come from different countries, meta-analysis provides an alternative way to investigate whether bargaining behavior in ultimatum games differs across countries. We find differences in behavior of responders (and not of proposers) across geographical regions. With one exception, these differences cannot be attributed to various cultural traits on which for instance the cultural classifications of Hofstede (1991) and Inglehart (2000) are based.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (302)

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/1386-4157/contents (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis (2004) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:expeco:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:171-188

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/10683/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Experimental Economics is currently edited by David J. Cooper, Lata Gangadharan and Charles N. Noussair

More articles in Experimental Economics from Springer, Economic Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:kap:expeco:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:171-188