From public monopsony to competitive market: more efficiency but higher prices

Josse Delfgaauw and Robert Dur

Oxford Economic Papers, 2009, vol. 61, issue 3, 586-602

Abstract: This paper examines the consequences of creating a fully competitive market in a sector previously dominated by a cost-minimizing public firm. Workers in the economy are heterogeneous in their intrinsic motivation to work in the sector. In line with empirical findings, our model implies that firms in the competitive market reach higher productivity and employ less workers than the public firm. Allocative efficiency therefore increases. Nevertheless, prices of the sector's output rise as competition between private firms for the best motivated workers leads to higher wage cost than under the public monopsony. Political support for liberalization may therefore be limited. Copyright 2009 , Oxford University Press.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpn032 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: From Public Monopsony to Competitive Market: More Efficiency but Higher Prices (2008)
Working Paper: From Public Monopsony to Competitive Market: More Efficiency but Higher Prices (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:61:y:2009:i:3:p:586-602

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Economic Papers is currently edited by James Forder and Francis J. Teal

More articles in Oxford Economic Papers from Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().