EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Can Gender Parity Break the Glass Ceiling? Evidence from a Repeated Randomized Experiment

Manuel Bagues and Berta Esteve-Volart ()

The Review of Economic Studies, 2010, vol. 77, issue 4, 1301-1328

Abstract: This paper studies whether the gender composition of recruiting committees matters. We make use of the unique evidence provided by Spanish public examinations, where the allocation of candidates to evaluating committees is random. We analyse how the chances of success of 150,000 female and male candidates for positions in the four main Corps of the Spanish Judiciary from 1987 to 2007 were affected by the gender composition of their evaluation committee. We find that a female (male) candidate is significantly less likely to be hired whenever she (he) is randomly assigned to a committee where the share of female (male) evaluators is relatively greater. Evidence from multiple choice tests suggests that this is due to the fact that female majority committees overestimate the quality of male candidates. Copyright , Wiley-Blackwell.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (196)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00601.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment (2007) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:77:y:2010:i:4:p:1301-1328

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman

More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:77:y:2010:i:4:p:1301-1328