Choosing the Carrot or the Stick? Endogenous Institutional Choice in Social Dilemma Situations
Matthias Sutter,
Stefan Haigner and
Martin Kocher
The Review of Economic Studies, 2010, vol. 77, issue 4, 1540-1566
Abstract:
We analyse an experimental public goods game in which group members can endogenously determine whether they want to supplement a standard voluntary contribution mechanism with the possibility of rewarding or punishing other group members. We find a significantly positive effect of endogenous institutional choice on the level of cooperation in comparison to the same exogenously implemented institutions. This suggests that participation rights enhance cooperation in groups. With endogenous choice, groups typically vote for the reward option, although punishment is even more effective in sustaining high levels of cooperation. Our results are evaluated against the predictions of social preference models. Copyright , Wiley-Blackwell.
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (363)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00608.x (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Choosing the Carrot or the Stick? Endogenous Institutional Choice in Social Dilemma Situations (2010)
Working Paper: Choosing the carrot or the stick? - Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:77:y:2010:i:4:p:1540-1566
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economic Studies is currently edited by Thomas Chaney, Xavier d’Haultfoeuille, Andrea Galeotti, Bård Harstad, Nir Jaimovich, Katrine Loken, Elias Papaioannou, Vincent Sterk and Noam Yuchtman
More articles in The Review of Economic Studies from Review of Economic Studies Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().