EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Further Support for Ranking Candidates in Elections

William V. Gehrlein (), Dominique Lepelley and Florenz Plassmann ()
Additional contact information
William V. Gehrlein: University of Delaware
Florenz Plassmann: Binghamton University

Group Decision and Negotiation, 2016, vol. 25, issue 5, No 4, 966 pages

Abstract: Abstract We compare the Condorcet Efficiencies of the plurality rule, the negative plurality rule, and the Borda rule to examine what might be gained by using a voting rule that requires candidate rankings. Previous analyses have considered (1) voting situations for which the three rules determine different candidates as winners (and the Condorcet Efficiencies might actually differ across the three rules) as well as (2) refined measures of Group Mutual Coherence that assess the presence of underlying models of rational behavior that governs voter preferences. In this paper, we present the final step of this particular line of analysis by analyzing (1) and (2) simultaneously. We conclude that there is a considerable benefit on the basis of Condorcet Efficiency from asking voters to submit candidate rankings in three-candidate elections.

Keywords: Condorcet efficiency; Group mutual coherence; IAC; Spatial model of voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D7 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-016-9470-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
Working Paper: Further Support for Ranking Candidates in Elections (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:grdene:v:25:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-016-9470-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10726/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10726-016-9470-1

Access Statistics for this article

Group Decision and Negotiation is currently edited by Gregory E. Kersten

More articles in Group Decision and Negotiation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:25:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-016-9470-1