EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

When are Nash equilibria self-enforcing? An experimental analysis

Ken Clark, Stephen Kay and Martin Sefton
Additional contact information
Stephen Kay: School of Economic Studies, Faculty of Economic and Social Studies, Dover Street, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL.
Martin Sefton: School of Economic Studies, Faculty of Economic and Social Studies, Dover Street, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL.

International Journal of Game Theory, 2001, vol. 29, issue 4, 495-515

Abstract: We investigate the effect of non-binding pre-play communication in experiments with simple two-player coordination games. We reproduce the results of other studies in which play converges to a Pareto-dominated equilibrium in the absence of communication, and communication moves outcomes in the direction of the Pareto-dominant equilibrium. However, we provide new results which show that the effectiveness of communication is sensitive to the structure of payoffs. Our results support an argument put forward by Aumann: agreements to play a Nash equilibrium are fragile when players have a strict preference over their opponent's strategy choice. We also find that informative communication does not necessarily lead to the Pareto-dominant equilibrium.

Date: 2001-05-04
Note: Received: January 1997/Revised version: February 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (103)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00182/papers/1029004/10290495.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

Related works:
Working Paper: When Are Nash Equilibria Self Enforcing ? An Experimental Analysis (1997)
Working Paper: When Are Nash Equilibria Self-Enforcing? An Experimental Analysis (1997) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jogath:v:29:y:2001:i:4:p:495-515

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/182/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Game Theory is currently edited by Shmuel Zamir, Vijay Krishna and Bernhard von Stengel

More articles in International Journal of Game Theory from Springer, Game Theory Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-25
Handle: RePEc:spr:jogath:v:29:y:2001:i:4:p:495-515