Loss Aversion and Labor Supply
Lorenz Goette (),
David Huffman () and
Ernst Fehr ()
Journal of the European Economic Association, 2004, vol. 2, issue 2-3, 216-228
In many occupations, workers' labor supply choices are constrained by institutional rules regulating labor time and effort provision. This renders explicit tests of the neoclassical theory of labor supply difficult. Here we present evidence from studies examining labor supply responses in "neoclassical environments" in which workers are free to choose when and how much to work. Despite the favorable environment, the results cast doubt on the neoclassical model. They are, however, consistent with a model of reference-dependent preferences exhibiting loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity. (JEL: J22, B49) Copyright (c) 2004 The European Economic Association.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (63) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1542-4774/issues link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: LOSS AVERSION AND LABOR SUPPLY (2004)
Working Paper: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply (2003)
Working Paper: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:jeurec:v:2:y:2004:i:2-3:p:216-228
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Xavier Vives, George-Marios Angeletos, Orazio P. Attanasio, Fabio Canova and Roberto Perotti
More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ann Olson ().