Economics at your fingertips  

Loss Aversion and Labor Supply

Lorenz Goette (), David Huffman () and Ernst Fehr ()

Journal of the European Economic Association, 2004, vol. 2, issue 2-3, 216-228

Abstract: In many occupations, workers' labor supply choices are constrained by institutional rules regulating labor time and effort provision. This renders explicit tests of the neoclassical theory of labor supply difficult. Here we present evidence from studies examining labor supply responses in "neoclassical environments" in which workers are free to choose when and how much to work. Despite the favorable environment, the results cast doubt on the neoclassical model. They are, however, consistent with a model of reference-dependent preferences exhibiting loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity. (JEL: J22, B49) Copyright (c) 2004 The European Economic Association.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (63) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: LOSS AVERSION AND LABOR SUPPLY (2004) Downloads
Working Paper: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the European Economic Association is currently edited by Xavier Vives, George-Marios Angeletos, Orazio P. Attanasio, Fabio Canova and Roberto Perotti

More articles in Journal of the European Economic Association from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ann Olson ().

Page updated 2021-09-08
Handle: RePEc:tpr:jeurec:v:2:y:2004:i:2-3:p:216-228