LOSS AVERSION AND LABOR SUPPLY
Ernst Fehr (),
David Huffman () and
Lorenz Goette ()
Method and Hist of Econ Thought from EconWPA
In many occupations, workers’ labor supply choices are constrained by institutional rules regulating labor time and effort provision. This renders explicit tests of the neoclassical theory of labor supply difŽ cult. Here we present evidence from studies examining labor supply responses in “neoclassical environments” in which workers are free to choose when and how much to work. Despite the favorable environment, the results cast doubt on the neoclassical model. They are, however, consistent with a model of reference-dependent preferences exhibiting loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity.
Keywords: labor supply; loss aversion; neoclassical environments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J22 B49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-lab and nep-ltv
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 13
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (46) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply (2004)
Working Paper: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply (2003)
Working Paper: Loss Aversion and Labor Supply
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0409003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Method and Hist of Econ Thought from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().