The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis
Colin Camerer (),
George Loewenstein () and
Journal of Political Economy, 1989, vol. 97, issue 5, 1232-54
In economic analyses of asymmetric information, better-informed agents are assumed capable of reproducing the judgments of less-informed agents. The authors discuss a systematic violation of this assumption that they call the "curse of knowledge." Better-informed agents are unable to ignore private information even when it is in their interest to do so; more information is not always better. Comparing judgments made in individual-level and market experiments, they find that market forces reduce the curse by approximately 50 percent, but do not eliminate it. Implications for bargaining, strategic behavior by firms, principal-agent problems, and choice under uncertainty are discussed. Copyright 1989 by University of Chicago Press.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (108) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261651 full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:97:y:1989:i:5:p:1232-54
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().