Courts: The Lex Mundi project
Simeon Djankov (),
Rafael La Porta (),
Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes () and
No 3344, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
In cooperation with Lex Mundi member law firms in 109 countries, we measure and describe the exact procedures used by litigants and courts to evict a tenant for non-payment of rent and to collect a bounced check. We use these data to construct an index of procedural formalism of dispute resolution for each country. We find that such formalism is systematically greater in civil than in common law countries. Moreover, procedural formalism is associated with higher expected duration of judicial proceedings, more corruption, less consistency, less honesty, less fairness in judicial decisions, and inferior access to justice. These results suggest that legal transplantation may have led to an inefficiently high level of procedural formalism, particularly in developing countries.
Keywords: courts; enforcement of contracts; judicial efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K40 P50 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org
Working Paper: Courts: the Lex Mundi Project (2003)
Working Paper: Courts: The Lex Mundi Project (2003)
Working Paper: Courts: The Lex Mundi Project (2002)
Working Paper: Courts: the Lex Mundi Project (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3344
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=3344
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().