Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments
Uri Gneezy and
John List ()
Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Recent discoveries in behavioral economics have led scholars to question the underpinnings of neoclassical economics. We use insights gained from one of the most influential lines of behavioral research -- gift exchange -- in an attempt to maximize worker effort in two quite distinct tasks: data entry for a university library and door-to-door fundraising for a research center. In support of the received literature, our field evidence suggests that worker effort in the first few hours on the job is considerably higher in the "gift" treatment than in the "non-gift treatment." After the initial few hours, however, no difference in outcomes is observed, and overall the gift treatment yielded inferior aggregate outcomes for the employer: with the same budget we would have logged more data for our library and raised more money for our research center by using the market-clearing wage rather than by trying to induce greater effort with a gift of higher wages.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (305) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments (2006)
Working Paper: Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00259
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joe Seidel ().