Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving
Anya Samek and
Roman Sheremeta
Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Abstract:
Recognizing donors by revealing their identities is important for increasing charitable giving. We conducted a field experiment to examine how different recognition methods impact giving, and found that all forms of recognition that we examined had a positive impact on increasing donations, whereby recognizing only highest donors (positive recognition) and recognizing only lowest donors (negative recognition) had the most pronounced effect. We argue that selective recognition (both positive and negative) creates tournament-like incentives. Recognizing the highest donors activates the desire to seek a positive prize of prestige, thus increasing the proportion of donors who contribute large amounts. Recognizing the lowest donors activates the desire to avoid a negative prize of shame, thus decreasing the proportion of donors who do not contribute or contribute very little. Therefore, selective recognition is an effective tool that can be used in the field by charities to increase donations.
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/fieldexperiments-papers2/papers/00431.pdf
Related works:
Journal Article: Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving (2017) 
Working Paper: Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving (2015) 
Working Paper: Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving (2015) 
Working Paper: Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00431
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesca Pagnotta ().