Carrots That Look Like Sticks: Toward an Understanding of Multitasking Incentive Schemes
Steffen Andersen (),
Uri Gneezy and
John List ()
Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Constructing compensation schemes for effort in multi-dimensional tasks is complex, particularly when some dimensions are not easily observable. When incentive schemes contractually reward workers for easily observed measures, such as quantity produced, the standard model predicts that unrewarded dimensions, such as quality, will be neglected. Yet, there remains mixed empirical evidence in favor of this standard principal-agent model prediction. This paper reconciles the literature by using both theory and empirical evidence. The theory outlines conditions under which principals can use a piece rate scheme to induce higher quantity and quality levels than analogous fixed wage schemes. Making use of a series of complementary laboratory and field experiments we show that this effect occurs because the agent is uncertain about the principal's monitoring ability and the principal's choice of a piece rate signals to the agent that she is efficient at monitoring.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Carrots That Look Like Sticks: Toward an Understanding of Multitasking Incentive Schemes (2015)
Working Paper: Carrots that Look Like Sticks: Toward an Understanding of Multitasking Incentive Schemes (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:feb:natura:00455
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Natural Field Experiments from The Field Experiments Website
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joe Seidel ().