Sharing Guilt: How Better Access to Information May Backfire
Kiryl Khalmetski and
No 90, Working Paper Series in Economics from University of Cologne, Department of Economics
We provide laboratory evidence that the attribution of guilt for disappointed trust is shared between the players whose choices eventually contributed to this disappointment (including the disappointed player herself). We refer to this as "shared guilt" and present a model that captures the phenomenon, and which is consistent with various previous findings. We also discuss potential policy implications.
Keywords: Shared guilt; trust; guilt aversion; responsibility diffusion; financial advice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D82 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://ockenfels.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/ ... _download/wp0090.pdf (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Sharing Guilt: How Better Access to Information May Backfire (2019)
Working Paper: Sharing Guilt: How Better Access to Information May Backfire (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kls:series:0090
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series in Economics from University of Cologne, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kiryl Khalmetski ().