To build or not to build? Capital stocks and climate policy
Elizabeth Baldwin, Yongyang Cai, Karlygash Kuralbayeva
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Elizabeth Baldwin (),
Karlygash Kuralbayeva and
Yongyang Cai ()
No 290, GRI Working Papers from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
We investigate how irreversibility in “dirty” and “clean” capital stocks affects optimal climate policy, from both theoretical and numerical perspectives. An increasing carbon tax will reduce investments in assets that pollute, and so reduce emissions in the short term: our “irreversibility effect”. As such the “Green Paradox” has a converse if we focus on demand side capital stock effects. We also show that the optimal subsidy increases with the deployment rate: our “acceleration effect”. Considering second-best settings, we show that, although carbon taxes achieve stringent targets more efficiently, in fact renewable subsidies deliver higher welfare when policy is more mild.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/ ... 90-Baldwin-et-al.pdf
Working Paper: To Build or Not to Build? Capital Stocks and Climate Policy (2018)
Working Paper: To Build or not to Build? Capital Stocks and Climate Policy (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp290
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GRI Working Papers from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The GRI Administration ().