The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication

Maximilian Andres (), Lisa Bruttel and Jana Friedrichsen
Additional contact information
Maximilian Andres: University of Potsdam

No 24, CEPA Discussion Papers from Center for Economic Policy Analysis

Abstract: The experimental literature on antitrust enforcement provides robust evidence that communication plays an important role for the formation and stability of cartels. We extend these studies through a design that distinguishes between innocuous communication and communication about a cartel, sanctioning only the latter. To this aim, we introduce a participant in the role of the competition authority, who is properly incentivized to judge communication content and price setting behavior of the firms. Using this novel design, we revisit the question whether a leniency rule successfully destabilizes cartels. In contrast to existing experimental studies, we find that a leniency rule does not affect cartelization. We discuss potential explanations for this contrasting result.

Keywords: cartel; judgment of communication; corporate leniency program; price competition; experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D43 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-com, nep-exp, nep-ind and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-49169 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication (2021)
Journal Article: The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication (2021)
Working Paper: The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pot:cepadp:24

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPA Discussion Papers from Center for Economic Policy Analysis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marco Winkler ().