Business models for interoperable mobility services
Vincent van den Berg,
Henk Meurs and
Erik Verhoef
Additional contact information
Henk Meurs: Radboud University
No 20-051/VIII, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Abstract:
Travellers often combine transport services from different firms to form trip chains: e.g. first taking a train and then a bus. Integration of different forms of public and private transport into a single service is gaining attention with the concept of mobility as a service (MaaS). Usually the attention focuses on such things as ease of use for travellers, and shifting demand away from the car. We focus on the effects of MaaS on behaviour and welfare via the market structure of transportation. In particular, we analyse three archetypical ways in which MaaS could be operationalised: Integrator, Platform, and Intermediary. We find that these models differ strongly in how consumers and firms are affected by the availability of MaaS technologies. The Integrator model seems best for consumers and social welfare. It always leads to lower prices than free competition without MaaS and therefore benefits consumers; transport firm profits can be lower or higher. The Platform model tends to lead to an outcome that is relatively close to free competition without MaaS: prices can be higher or lower, while transport firm profits are lower. Finally, the Intermediary model tends to lead to much higher prices. Regulation of the price that the MaaS firm has to pay may lower prices, but, compared to the Integrator model, the change due to regulation is often small. So, even without price regulation, MaaS supply can already benefit consumers by increasing competition and removing serial marginalisation, even before we consider other benefits of MaaS such as information provision, ease of use, and a demand shift towards public transport.
Keywords: MaaS; market structure; platform; intermediary; integrator; regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D21 D43 R40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-08-20, Revised 2021-04-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec, nep-com, nep-reg and nep-tre
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/20051.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20200051
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().