MEAT TRACEABILITY: ARE U.S. CONSUMERS WILLING TO PAY FOR IT?
David Dickinson and
DeeVon Bailey ()
No 2002-07, Working Papers from Utah State University, Department of Economics
This article reports the results from a series of laboratory auction markets in which consumers bid on meat characteristics. The characteristics examined include meat traceability (i.e., the ability to trace the retail meat back to the farm or animal or origin), transparency (e.g., knowing that the meat was produced without growth hormones, or knowing the animal was humanely treated), and assurances (e.g., extra meat safety assurances). This laboratory study provides non-hypothetical bid data on U.S. consumer preferences for traceability, transparency, and assurances (TTA) in red meat at a time when the U.S. currently lags other countries in development of TTA meat systems. Our results suggest that U.S. consumers would be willing to pay for such TTA meat characteristics, and the magnitude of the consumer bids suggest a likely profitable market for development of U.S. TTA systems.
Pages: 18 pages
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (72) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
ftp://repec.bus.usu.edu/RePEc/usu/pdf/ERI2002-07.pdf First version, 2002 (application/pdf)
Journal Article: MEAT TRACEABILITY: ARE U.S. CONSUMERS WILLING TO PAY FOR IT? (2002)
Working Paper: MEAT TRACEABILITY: ARE U. S. CONSUMERS WILLING TO PAY FOR IT? (2002)
Working Paper: Meat traceability: are U.S. consumers willing to pay for it? (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usu:wpaper:2002-07
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Utah State University, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John Gilbert ().