Building an Equilibrium: Rules versus Principles in Relational Contracts

Robert Gibbons, Manuel Grieder, Holger Herz and Christian Zehnder

No 16802, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Effective collaboration within and between organizations requires efficient adaptation to unforeseen change. We study how parties build relational contracts that achieve this goal. We focus on the “clarity problem†—whether parties have a shared understanding of the promises they make each other. Specifically, (a) a buyer and seller play a trading game in several periods, (b) they know their environment will change but do not know how, and (c) before any trading occurs they can reach a non-binding agreement about how to play the entire game. We hypothesize that pairs whose initial agreement defines a broad principle rather than a narrow rule will be more successful in solving the clarity problem and in achieving efficient adaptation after unforeseen change. In our Baseline condition, we indeed observe that pairs who articulated principles achieved significantly higher performance after change occurred. Underlying this correlation, we also find that pairs with principle-based agreements were more likely both to expect and to take actions that were consistent with what their agreement prescribed. To investigate a causal link between principle-based agreements and performance, we implemented a “Nudge†intervention that induced more pairs to articulate principles. The intervention succeeded in co- ordinating more pairs on efficient quality immediately after the unforeseen change, but it failed to coordinate expectations on price, ultimately leading to conflicts and preventing an increase in long-run performance after the shock. Our results suggest that (1) principle-based agreements may improve organizational performance, but that (2) high-performing relational contracts may be difficult to build.

Keywords: Relational contracts; Clarity; Adaptation; Cooperation; Principles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16802 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Working Paper: Building an Equilibrium: Rules Versus Principles in Relational Contracts (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16802

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16802

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().