 Scale format effects on response option interpretation and useElke Cabooter, Bert Weijters, Maggie Geuens and Iris Vermeir () Journal of Business Research, 2016, vol. 69, issue 7, 2574-2584 Abstract: When designing questionnaires, researchers often use different scale formats, which vary on the dimensions polarity (unipolar versus bipolar endpoint labels) and the numbering of the response options (e.g., only positive numbers versus positive and negative numbers). This study uses survey experiments and cognitive interviews, to test specific hypotheses regarding how scale formats' polarity and their numbering might affect (1) observed response distributions and (2) the meaning of response options. In line with our theoretical predictions, the results unveil consistent differences in the interpretation and use of the scale formats as a function of their polarity and numbering. Therefore, alternative formats cannot be used interchangeably as the scale formats are differently interpreted and used. In addition, researchers need to choose scale formats and interpret scale responses in accordance with respondents' interpretations. Keywords: Response behavior; Polarity; Numbering; Survey design; Survey research (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:7:p:2574-2584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.138 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.