Betting on Diversity—Occupational Segregation and Gender Stereotypes

Urs Fischbacher (), Dorothea Kübler () and Robert Stüber ()
Additional contact information
Urs Fischbacher: Department of Economics, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany; Thurgau Institute of Economics, 8280 Kreuzlingen, Switzerland
Dorothea Kübler: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 10785 Berlin, Germany; Faculty of Economics and Management, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany; CESifo, 81679 Munich, Germany
Robert Stüber: Center for Behavioral Institutional Design, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi 129188, United Arab Emirates

Management Science, 2024, vol. 70, issue 8, 5502-5516

Abstract: Gender segregation of occupations and entire industries is widespread. The segregation could be the result of perceived job-specific productivity differences between men and women. It could also result from the belief that homogeneous teams perform better or from in-group bias of male or female recruiters. We investigate these explanations in two samples: students and personnel managers. The subjects bet on the productivity of teams that are homogeneous with respect to gender at the outset and then either remain homogeneous or become diverse. The teams work on tasks that differ with respect to gender stereotypes. We obtain similar results in both samples. Women are picked more often for the stereotypically female task, and men are picked more often for the stereotypically male task. Subjects believe that gender-diverse teams perform better, especially in the task with complementarities, and they display an own-gender bias. Elicited expectations about the bets of others reveal that subjects expect the gender stereotypes of tasks but underestimate others’ bets on diversity.

Keywords: gender segregation; hiring decisions; teams; discrimination; stereotypes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4943 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5502-5516

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().