Promises, expectations & causation

Giovanni Di Bartolomeo (), Martin Dufwenberg, Stefano Papa and Francesco Passarelli

No 140, CIMEO Working Paper Series from Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO)

Abstract: Why do people keep their promises? Vanberg (2008) and Ederer & Stremitzer (2017) provide causal evidence in favor of, respectively, an intrinsic preference for keeping one's word and Charness & Dufwenberg's (2006) expectations-based account based on guilt aversion. The overall picture is incomplete though, as no study disentangles effects in a design that provides exogenous variation of both (the key features of) promises and beliefs. We report evidence from an experimental design that does so.

Date: 2018-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.dipecodir.it/wpcom/data/wp_no_140_2018.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Promises, expectations & causation (2019)
Working Paper: Promises, Expectations & Causation (2018)
Working Paper: Promises, Expectations & Causation (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ter:wpaper:00140

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CIMEO Working Paper Series from Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giovanni Di Bartolomeo ().