EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Regulating dynamic congestion externalities with tradable credit schemes: does a unique equilibrium exist?

Yue Bao, Erik Verhoef and Paul Koster
Additional contact information
Yue Bao: VU Amsterdam

No 19-017/VIII, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute

Abstract: Tradable credit schemes offer a potentially efficient, revenue-neutral policy alternative to classical dynamic pricing of congestion externalities. We show in this paper that the resulting equilibrium may not be unique for particular models of congestion, including the first-best solution for the conventional Vickrey’s bottleneck model. This can have substantial detrimental impacts on social welfare and social acceptance of tradable credit schemes. The reason underlying this result is that the credit supply-demand condition can be satisfied for a continuum of credit prices. This is because any marginal change in the credit price will be matched by a compensating change in queuing times, keeping user price fixed but deviating from the first-best optimum in which no queueing should occur. We find that the problem of non-uniqueness does not occur for the well-known dynamic flow congestion model proposed by Chu. A unique equilibrium can be obtained in the bottleneck model if the buying and selling of credits with a bank is allowed, against a pre-determined price. Credits are then still tradable so that the use can deviate from the initial distribution, but the credit price is determined by the perfectly elastic demand and supply from the bank.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/19017.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Regulating dynamic congestion externalities with tradable credit schemes: Does a unique equilibrium exist? (2019) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20190017

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-19
Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20190017