Job-market signaling and screening: An experimental comparison
Dorothea Kübler (),
Wieland Müller and
Hans-Theo Normann ()
Games and Economic Behavior, 2008, vol. 64, issue 1, 219-236
We analyze the Spence education game in experimental markets. We compare a signaling and a screening variant, and we analyze the effect of increasing the number of competing employers from two to three. In all treatments, efficient workers invest more often in education and employers pay higher wages to workers who have invested. However, separation of workers is incomplete and wages do not converge to equilibrium levels. In the signaling treatment, we observe significantly more separating outcomes compared to the screening treatment. Increasing the number of employers leads to higher wages in the signaling sessions but not in the screening sessions.
Keywords: Job-market; signaling; Job-market; screening; Sorting; Bayesian; games; Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (23) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Job Market Signaling and Screening: An Experimental Comparison (2005)
Working Paper: Job market signaling and screening: An experimental comparison (2004)
Working Paper: Job Market Signalling and Screening: An Experimental Comparison (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:64:y:2008:i:1:p:219-236
Access Statistics for this article
Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai
More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu ().