Futures & Foresight Science
2019 - 2025
From John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().
Access Statistics for this journal.
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series.
Volume 2, issue 3-4, 2020
- Thematic reflections on 18 expert commentaries

- Paul Schoemaker
- Historical methods in the social sciences: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Johann Peter Murmann
- The Mont Fleur scenarios and particular histories: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Pieter le Roux
- Future‐ography

- David J. Staley
- Foresight, hindsight and postcolonial thought: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Eilidh Wright
- Past‐future synergies: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Dilek Önkal and Shari De Baets
- A few epistemological thoughts on linking history and scenarios: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Liam Fahey
- Mechanics of the future: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Heiko A. von der Gracht
- Historian's pasts and scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- David MacLaren McDonald
- History and scenario planning: A commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- James Derbyshire
- How historical analysis can enrich scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- George Cairns
- History can reject teleology; not so, scenario planning: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Thomas Donaldson
- A cognitive science perspective on historical narratives and future scenarios: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- J. Edward Russo
- The brakes of precedent and gears of emergence: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Adam V. Gordon
- Scenarios as narrative past and future: A commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Lee Roy Beach
- Intensifying intellectual traffic between history and futures studies: A commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Nicholas J. Rowland and Matthew J. Spaniol
- A modeler's perspective: A commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Martin Kunc
- Studies past and future of the past and future: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- David R. Mandel
- Can we accelerate learning from history? South Africa then and now: Commentary on Schoemaker 2020

- Philip E. Tetlock
- How historical analysis can enrich scenario planning

- Paul Schoemaker
- A reflection on the mass production of scenarios in response to COVID‐19

- George Cairns and George Wright
- Scenario planning as strategic activity: A practice‐orientated approach

- Gary Bowman and R. Bradley MacKay
Volume 2, issue 2, 2020
- Psychological biases and heuristics in the context of foresight and scenario processes

- Elna Schirrmeister, Anne‐Louise Göhring and Philine Warnke
- Scenario planning in science‐centric organizations

- Rafael Ramirez, Ciaran McGinley and Jenni Rissanen
- Does the facilitator of a scenario development activity need substantive knowledge of the focal topic?

- George Wright and George Cairns
- Corporate foresight as a microfoundation of dynamic capabilities

- Jan Oliver Schwarz, René Rohrbeck and Bernhard Wach
Volume 2, issue 1, 2020
- Can education transform?: Contradictions between the emerging future and the walled past

- Sohail Inayatullah
- Foresight, cognition, and long‐term performance: Insights from the automotive industry and opportunities for future research

- Riccardo Vecchiato, Giampiero Favato, Francesco di Maddaloni and Hang Do
- Determinants of organizational vigilance: Leadership, foresight, and adaptation in three sectors

- Paul Schoemaker and George S. Day
- Horizon Scanning in Foresight – Why Horizon Scanning is only a part of the game

- Kerstin E. Cuhls
Volume 1, issue 2, 2019
- Effectiveness of Delphi‐ and scenario planning‐like processes in enabling organizational adaptation: A simulation‐based comparison

- Shardul S. Phadnis
- A generalized many‐objective optimization approach for scenario discovery

- Jan H. Kwakkel
- Extracting scenario archetypes: A quantitative text analysis of documents about the future

- Alessandro Fergnani and Mike Jackson
- Scenario planning in the analytic hierarchy process

- Ian Durbach
- Public understanding of futures & foresight science: A reply to Chermack’s response

- Nicholas J. Rowland and Matthew J. Spaniol
- Response to Spaniol and Rowland: “Defining Scenario”

- Thomas J. Chermack
- Chronotopes of foresight: Models of time‐space in probabilistic, possibilistic and constructivist futures

- Ilkka Tuomi
Volume 1, issue 1, 2019
- The influence of graphical format on judgmental forecasting accuracy: Lines versus points

- Zoe Theocharis, Leonard A. Smith and Nigel Harvey
- Why should we understand the future and how can we do it?

- Joni Karjalainen and Sirkka Heinonen
- Attention and foresight in organizations

- Paul Schoemaker
- Submission and citation practices in Futures & Foresight Science and our commitment to integrity and ethics

- Graham Russel and George Wright
- Defining scenario

- Matthew J. Spaniol and Nicholas J. Rowland
- About “Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century,” edited by Riel Miller

- Robin Bourgeois
- A welcome from the Editors

- George Wright, George Cairns and Heiko von der Gracht
- Making scenario interventions matter: Exploring issues of power and rationality

- George Cairns and George Wright
- Use of scenario planning as a theory‐driven evaluation tool

- James Derbyshire