Promises, expectations & causation
Giovanni Di Bartolomeo (giovanni.dibartolomeo@uniroma1.it),
Martin Dufwenberg,
Stefano Papa and
Passarelli Francesco
wp.comunite from Department of Communication, University of Teramo
Abstract:
Why do people keep their promises? Vanberg (2008) and Ederer & Stremitzer (2017) provide causal evidence in favor of, respectively, an intrinsic preference for keeping one’s word and Charness & Dufwenberg’s (2006) expectations-based account based on guilt aversion. The overall picture is incomplete though, as no study disentangles effects in a design that provides exogenous variation of both (the key features of) promises and beliefs. We report evidence from an experimental design that does so.
Date: 2018-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.dipecodir.it/wpcom/data/wp_no_140_2018.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Promises, expectations & causation (2019) 
Working Paper: Promises, Expectations & Causation (2018) 
Working Paper: Promises, Expectations & Causation (2018) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ter:wpaper:00140
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in wp.comunite from Department of Communication, University of Teramo
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Giovanni Di Bartolomeo (giovanni.dibartolomeo@uniroma1.it).